Welcome to the community

The best social media network for people to connect, collaborate, share content and inspire each other.

First of all, sorry for the double posting.The problem above happened with one specific picture (actually a copy of a picture) and after a while of playing around with versions 916.0e94264 and 913.g85f2b8b15 and getting the problem with both versions, editing the original picture worked fine. And after that the copy which initially displayed the problem also allowed to be edited properly. Strange, so I withdraw the above posting. I'm also happy to report that now the AppImages work under Gentoo Linux - this was not the case some months ago when I first tried to use them.
·
Added a discussion
I'm running into a strange new problem with masks in the new version 0e94264 of ansel I just compiled. When applying some operation, eg., change of exposure by one stop, to the whole image, the change usually is easily visible. In the new version, when I then select, say, a drawn mask, e.g., an ellipse, and then click on the image, the exposure reverts to the initial value, the green outline appears, and within the green outline the effect is miniscule compared to before, if present at all. Moreover when I click on the mask refinement symbol (white square with a dark circle inside), the whole picture turns black and white, with the masked region marked very faintly in yellow. This used to be very clear and bright yellow before. The terminal from which I started ansel repeatedly shows the message "[_dev_add_history_item_ext] invalidating history", apparently for any action I take in ansel. I first noticed this problem with the Contrast equalizer module, but the same problems occurs with the exposure module and also with different pictures.Ansel is self-compiled under Gentoo Linux 6.6.52. How can I revert to the previous version?
  • 292
·
Added a post
I'm running into a strange new problem with masks in the new version 0e94264 of ansel I just compiled. When applying some operation, eg., change of exposure by one stop, to the whole image, the change usually is easily visible. In the new version, when I then select, say, a drawn mask, e.g., an ellipse, and then click on the image, the exposure reverts to the initial value, the green outline appears, and within the green outline the effect is miniscule compared to before, if present at all. Moreover when I click on the mask refinement symbol (white square with a dark circle inside), the whole picture turns black and white, with the masked region marked very faintly in yellow. This used to be very clear and bright yellow before. The terminal from which I started ansel repeatedly shows the message "[_dev_add_history_item_ext] invalidating history", apparently for any action I take in ansel. I first noticed this problem with the Contrast equalizer module, but the same problems occurs with the exposure module and also with different pictures.Ansel is self-compiled under Gentoo Linux 6.6.52.
  • 311
·
Added a discussion
Hello @Aurélien Pierre, just to inform you that the installation command has changed if you want to update it in your wiki here:https://ansel.photos/en/doc/install/linux/sudo amdgpu-install --usecase=opencl --opencl=rocr --no-dkms This should be enough, after downloading and installing the amd package to manage the installation of its drivers.
  • 443
·
Added a discussion
Hello guys, I just discovered Ansel, I am already a Darkatble fan but I have never been able to use it with satisfaction because it is too dispersive and unnecessarily complex in my opinion; I am happy to have found this project that shares my thoughts. Up to now I have used base curve for the development of raw, I hope to understand how the Ansel pixelpipe works with Filmic RGB 😅
  • 468
Styles have been deactivated because its code needs to be rewritten.
·
Added a discussion
I often find myself forgetting to compress the history stack and occasionally get warnings about very many stack levels and masks (forgot the precise wording). I would be useful to be able to select a bunch of pictures and compress all their history stacks, rather than having to do that one picture at a time.
  • 598
·
Added a discussion
When copying the development stack from a picture where highlight reconstruction is active to similar pictures, in the result highlight reconstruction is not active (but set to the value of the first picture). So I need to switch it on manually. Again, version 85f2b8b, self-compiled under Gentoo-Linux.
  • 601
OK, I just realized: after stopping ansel and then re-opening it, the style in question has been applied to the selected picture.
·
Added a discussion
I'm having problems with styles: I can create styles from the current history stack in the darkroom, but when I try to apply the style, ansel freezes and shows the message "Ansel ist not responding", eventually forcing me to quit ansel. In the lighttable view, none of my styles are listed under the corresponding rider. This happens in version 85f2b8b, self-compiled under Gentoo-Linux, but it has been an issue for quite a while.
  • 602
OK, that helps a lot. Thank you!
Hello Aurélien, Est ce que vous avez pu avancer sur ce bug ? Quel est le statut de ce bug ?par avance merci Bien cordialement
Possibilité 1 : / Possibility 1:https://ansel.photos/en/doc/modules/utility-modules/lighttable/selected-imagePossibilité 2 : / Possibility 2:Script Lua / Lua scriptPossibilité 3 : / Possibility 3:J'utilise personnellement hdrmerge indépendamment de Darktable/AnselI personally use hdrmerge independently of Darktable/Anselhttps://jcelaya.github.io/hdrmerge/Bonne réception / Good reception
·
Added a discussion
Hello everyoneHow is it possible to “blend” photos with different exposures as HDR Like?Best regard-----------------------------------------------Bonjour à tousComment est-il possible de « mélanger » des photos avec différentes expositions pour faire du HDR?Par avance merci de votre aide Bien cordialement
  • 1367
Hello everyone.First of all, I would like to congratulate everyone involved on this truly fantastic software!In my opinion, this is the first and only FOSS software that has a chance to find widespread use in the "photo world". Most FOSS software and FOSS "workflow" is far too complicated. The best solution for this software would be (my opinion), on an Intel CPU clear Linux and a compilation on source. But "normal people" will never run clear Linux and will never compile from source.Many photographers, especially female ones, are not interested in IT topics.The big problem is that "IT topics" and "digital images" are difficult or even impossible to separate.I am currently working on my own YouTube channel (in German language) which will be dedicated to the topic of photography in general and also image editing with FOSS software (I hate Photoshop, but for different reasons than I hate the most FOSS software photo editing tools).Maybe I can contribute something to this community.best regards
·
Added a discussion
select Retouch module/select Shape/position & adjust/Compress history stack/select Retouch module/click on the Input shape. Input will now be applied.
  • 1765
·
Added a discussion
Open image in Darkroom/select Exposure/select Blending/select Drawn Mask/select Add Gradient/position Gradient/adjust ExposureNow look and watch in the Exposure Module where it says 'Drawn mask: 1 shape used'. While watching, click on Compress History Stack. ':no mask used'
  • 1756
Je n’est pas testé avec tous les modules, ni avec un lot de photos.Sur cette image (4 prises de vue avec 3 expositions), j’ai constaté que la création du masque me faisant des misères avec le module « exposition », était possible avec le module « calibration des couleurs ». Le déplacement du module exposition après le profil de couleur d’entrée m’a permis de créer le masque. De là a en tirer une conclusion définitive !
Ok , je viens de trouver le bouton "Select New". Fallait lire le manuel avant de cliquer. Par contre j'ajoute un point car je viens de m'en rendre compte. L'ajout automatique des tags trouvés dans les photos importées, à notre liste hiérarchique de tag n'est pas une bonne idée. C'est très pratique pour une migration, mais après, une fois la liste établie ça n'a plus d'intérêt en cas de réimport. Je pense qu'une option on/off dans la fenêtre d'import ou dans les paramètres serait bienvenue.
que dans le module d’exposition?